I recently responded (privately) to a note sent in response to the very first posting of the Boomer Report. In it, the writer took issue with some of my statements—not because he disagreed, but because he had a different focus. That is, rather than considering the Boomers as a total segment, he addressed himself to the issue of the oldest Boomers—those who were born in 1946–1949 and whom he felt would now be heavily into thinking and planning for their retirement. This, he felt, should be the focus of Boomer Marketing.
After several exchanges on that issue, I decided to try bringing him back to the broader focus with the following note. I would love to hear from those of you who agree—or disagree!!
I think we are losing sight of the big picture here. With your focus on those who will be retiring (or thinking of retiring) in the next five years, you seem to be fixing on those Boomers born in 1946-1949. However, the bulk of the Boomers was born in the 1950s—and they are now in the 46-55 age range.
If you will read the balance of the postings to my Blog, you will note that my focus is to have marketers, advertisers and agencies dismiss the artificial 18-49 age range they use to set their strategic and media planning. The money here in the U.S. is in the hands of the 50+ crowd—and they are not shy about spending it. (BTW, the writer I am addressing here is Canadian)
My goal is to have these marketers forget (or make secondary) the ancient thinking about building their market long-term—and go after the market that now exists. That is, the 50+ crowd—which has the money and is (for the most part) eager to spend it on what is new.
Why this focus to my thinking and writing? It is simply because marketers are not willing to accept the fact that the long-term market (and the building thereof) is in itself a fiction. Loyalty to one brand or another is today a factor of “what have you done for me lately”—not habit.
Recent Comments